Re: [PATCH] kmemcheck: make bitfield annotations truly no-ops whendisabled

From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Wed Dec 09 2009 - 08:55:24 EST

Next message: Jens Axboe: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] cfq-iosched: Take care of corner cases of grouplosing share due to deletion"
Previous message: Jonathan Miles: "Re: OOM kernel behaviour - 2.6.32"
In reply to: Pekka Enberg: "Re: [PATCH] kmemcheck: make bitfield annotations truly no-ops whendisabled"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Le 09/12/2009 14:31, Pekka Enberg a écrit :

>
> I guess so. Eric, how bad is the regression?
>

Not too bad, skbuff one was separately addressed.

http://git2.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=14d18a81b5171d4433e41129619c75748b4f4d26
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jens Axboe: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] cfq-iosched: Take care of corner cases of grouplosing share due to deletion"
Previous message: Jonathan Miles: "Re: OOM kernel behaviour - 2.6.32"
In reply to: Pekka Enberg: "Re: [PATCH] kmemcheck: make bitfield annotations truly no-ops whendisabled"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]