[tip:perf/urgent] perf probe: Fix add-probe command syntax without --add option

From: tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu
Date: Wed Dec 09 2009 - 02:29:07 EST


Commit-ID: d1bde3f755e8652faad59e264c466c4baab68fa8
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/d1bde3f755e8652faad59e264c466c4baab68fa8
Author: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 17:02:54 -0500
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 07:26:51 +0100

perf probe: Fix add-probe command syntax without --add option

Fix add-probe command syntax without --add option.
perf-probe supports add-probe command without --add
option. But it treats each argument as an event definition.
e.g.

perf probe func arg1 arg2

is interpreted as

perf probe --add func --add arg1 --add arg2

But it may be useless in many cases.

This patch fixes this syntax to fold those arguments into
one event definition if there is no --add option. With this
change, above command is interpreted as below;

perf probe --add "func arg1 arg2"

Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jim Keniston <jkenisto@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Frank Ch. Eigler <fche@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: K.Prasad <prasad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: systemtap <systemtap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: DLE <dle-develop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
LKML-Reference: <20091208220254.10142.73767.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
---
tools/perf/builtin-probe.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c b/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c
index 8993a1f..1347fdf 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c
@@ -79,6 +79,25 @@ static void parse_probe_event(const char *str)
pr_debug("%d arguments\n", pp->nr_args);
}

+static void parse_probe_event_argv(int argc, const char **argv)
+{
+ int i, len;
+ char *buf;
+
+ /* Bind up rest arguments */
+ len = 0;
+ for (i = 0; i < argc; i++)
+ len += strlen(argv[i]) + 1;
+ buf = zalloc(len + 1);
+ if (!buf)
+ die("Failed to allocate memory for binding arguments.");
+ len = 0;
+ for (i = 0; i < argc; i++)
+ len += sprintf(&buf[len], "%s ", argv[i]);
+ parse_probe_event(buf);
+ free(buf);
+}
+
static int opt_add_probe_event(const struct option *opt __used,
const char *str, int unset __used)
{
@@ -160,7 +179,7 @@ static const struct option options[] = {

int cmd_probe(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __used)
{
- int i, j, ret;
+ int i, ret;
#ifndef NO_LIBDWARF
int fd;
#endif
@@ -168,8 +187,8 @@ int cmd_probe(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __used)

argc = parse_options(argc, argv, options, probe_usage,
PARSE_OPT_STOP_AT_NON_OPTION);
- for (i = 0; i < argc; i++)
- parse_probe_event(argv[i]);
+ if (argc > 0)
+ parse_probe_event_argv(argc, argv);

if ((session.nr_probe == 0 && !listing) ||
(session.nr_probe != 0 && listing))
@@ -200,8 +219,8 @@ int cmd_probe(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __used)
}

/* Searching probe points */
- for (j = 0; j < session.nr_probe; j++) {
- pp = &session.probes[j];
+ for (i = 0; i < session.nr_probe; i++) {
+ pp = &session.probes[i];
if (pp->found)
continue;

@@ -223,8 +242,8 @@ end_dwarf:
#endif /* !NO_LIBDWARF */

/* Synthesize probes without dwarf */
- for (j = 0; j < session.nr_probe; j++) {
- pp = &session.probes[j];
+ for (i = 0; i < session.nr_probe; i++) {
+ pp = &session.probes[i];
if (pp->found) /* This probe is already found. */
continue;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/