Re: [patch 09/23] locking: Implement new raw_spinlock

[Yong Zhang]

On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:02 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Now that the raw_spin name space is freed up, we can implement
> raw_spinlock and the related functions which are used to annotate the
> locks which are not converted to sleeping spinlocks in preempt-rt.
>
> A side effect is that only such locks can be used with the low level
> lock fsunctions which circumvent lockdep.

s/fsunctions/functions
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/