Re: [PATCH] Fix tracing infrastructure to support multipleincludes when defining CREATE_TRACE_POINTS

[Steven Rostedt]

On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 15:47 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> > 
> > Note this patch also converts the napi_poll tracepoint to a TRACE_EVENT.  This
> > is done so that the TRACE_EVENT fix doesn't break the build, and because its
> > rather pointless I think given the current tracing infrastructure to not have
> > napi_poll be an independent event.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Thanks, I'll give it a test. But because this now touches networking
> code, I need an Acked-by from David Miller before I can pull it in.
> 
> -- Steve
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > 
> > linux/tracepoint.h   |   45 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> > trace/define_trace.h |    1 +
> > trace/events/napi.h  |   25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---

Hmm, This really isn't networking code. But still, a patch that changes
the way a networking trace point works, I would rather have an ack.

Thanks,

-- Steve

> > 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/tracepoint.h b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> > index 2aac8a8..311abbf 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> > @@ -58,28 +58,6 @@ struct tracepoint {
> >  		rcu_read_unlock_sched_notrace();			\
> >  	} while (0)
> >  


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/