Re: [RFC][PATCH 03/10] arm: mxc: changes to common plat-mxc codetoadd support for i.MX5

[Robert Schwebel]

Rob,

On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 10:17:52AM -0700, Herring Robert-RA7055 wrote:
> Sorry, my mistake. Sasha is correct that MX27 is v1 and MX25 is v2.
> 
> timer_is_v1 is just !timer_is_v2, so really only one is needed. I would
> define it like this to avoid having to change the timer code again for
> any new chips:
> 
> #define timer_is_v2()   (!(cpu_is_mx1() || cpu_is_mx21() ||
> cpu_is_mx27()))

Are you sure that FSL won't invent a v3 timer in the future?

rsc
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/