[077/119] sfc: Set ip_summed correctly for page buffers passed to GRO

From: Greg KH
Date: Sun Dec 06 2009 - 19:21:31 EST


2.6.31-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 345056af41feeda506a8993474b9cbb2c66bc9fb ]

Page buffers containing packets with an incorrect checksum or using a
protocol not handled by hardware checksum offload were previously not
passed to LRO. The conversion to GRO changed this, but did not set
the ip_summed value accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/sfc/rx.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/sfc/rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/rx.c
@@ -444,7 +444,8 @@ static void efx_rx_packet__check_len(str
* the appropriate LRO method
*/
static void efx_rx_packet_lro(struct efx_channel *channel,
- struct efx_rx_buffer *rx_buf)
+ struct efx_rx_buffer *rx_buf,
+ bool checksummed)
{
struct napi_struct *napi = &channel->napi_str;

@@ -466,7 +467,8 @@ static void efx_rx_packet_lro(struct efx
skb->len = rx_buf->len;
skb->data_len = rx_buf->len;
skb->truesize += rx_buf->len;
- skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
+ skb->ip_summed =
+ checksummed ? CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY : CHECKSUM_NONE;

napi_gro_frags(napi);

@@ -475,6 +477,7 @@ out:
rx_buf->page = NULL;
} else {
EFX_BUG_ON_PARANOID(!rx_buf->skb);
+ EFX_BUG_ON_PARANOID(!checksummed);

napi_gro_receive(napi, rx_buf->skb);
rx_buf->skb = NULL;
@@ -570,7 +573,7 @@ void __efx_rx_packet(struct efx_channel
}

if (likely(checksummed || rx_buf->page)) {
- efx_rx_packet_lro(channel, rx_buf);
+ efx_rx_packet_lro(channel, rx_buf, checksummed);
goto done;
}



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/