Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/12] PCI run-time PM support (updated)

From: Jesse Barnes
Date: Fri Dec 04 2009 - 18:21:57 EST


On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:32:44 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The following (updated) series of patches provides preliminary
> run-time power management support for PCI devices through ACPI and/or
> the native PCIe PME.
>
> Some patches have been modified since the previous iteration and two
> new patches have been added. Also, I've tested this patchset with
> the native PCIe PME mechanism using the r8169 driver on the MSI Wind
> U-100 (see the last patch for details).
>
> [1/12] - Add flag for marking devices capable of generating wake-up
> events at run time
> [2/12] - Add function for checking PME status of devices
>
> [3/12] - Modify wake-up enable propagation so that it's done for PCIe
> devices too
> [4/12] - PCIe PME root port service driver
>
> [5/12][New] - "Don't use MSIs for PME signaling" switch for PCIe
>
> [6/12] - ACPI GPE refcounting, from Matthew
>
> [7/12] - ACPI drivers support for GPE refcounting, from Matthew
>
> [8/12] - ACPI removal of the old GPE API, from Matthew
>
> [9/12] - ACPI add fields for handling run-wake devices
>
> [10/12] - PCI ACPI platform support for run-time power management
>
> [11/12] - Runtime PM callbacks for the PCI bus type
>
> [12/12] - Runtime PM support for r8169 (experimental)
>
> If there are no objections, I think the patches [1-11/12] are ready
> for merging at this point.

Len, it sounds like this patchset is settling down. Have you or one of
the ACPI folks had a chance to check out the ACPI GPE changes? I can
take it all through my PCI tree if you're ok with it.

--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/