Re: [RFC][PATCH 01/10] arm: mxc: New interrupt controller (TZIC)for i.MX5 family

From: Uwe Kleine-König
Date: Fri Dec 04 2009 - 04:36:12 EST


Hi,

On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 04:47:01AM +0200, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> Freescale i.MX51 processor uses a different interrupt controller. Add the
> driver and fix the Makefile to account for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/plat-mxc/Kconfig | 4 +
> arch/arm/plat-mxc/Makefile | 9 ++-
> arch/arm/plat-mxc/tzic.c | 180 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-mxc/tzic.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/Kconfig b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/Kconfig
> index ca5c7c2..11bf691 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/Kconfig
> @@ -75,4 +75,8 @@ config ARCH_HAS_RNGA
>
> config ARCH_MXC_IOMUX_V3
> bool
> +
> +config MXC_TZIC
> + bool
> + depends on ARCH_MXC
> endif
The whole file arch/arm/plat-mxc/Kconfig is a big

if ARCH_MXC
...
endif

so there is no need for "depends on ARCH_MXC"

> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/Makefile b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/Makefile
> index e3212c8..5be53ca 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/Makefile
> @@ -3,7 +3,14 @@
> #
>
> # Common support
> -obj-y := irq.o clock.o gpio.o time.o devices.o cpu.o system.o
> +obj-y := clock.o gpio.o time.o devices.o cpu.o system.o
> +
> +# MX51 uses the TZIC interrupt controller, older platforms use AVIC
> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_MXC_TZIC),y)
> +obj-y += tzic.o
> +else
> +obj-y += irq.o
> +endif
We're not there yet, but in the future we want to build kernel images
that run on (say) imx51 and imx27. In such a kernel we'd need irq.o
*and* tzic.o. So don't kick out irq.o when CONFIG_MXC_TZIC but make
that dependant on the other SOCs.

> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/tzic.c b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/tzic.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..3af8fc6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/tzic.c
> [...]
> +static void mxc_mask_irq(unsigned int irq)
please add a namespace for these functions. There is already a function
mxc_mask_irq. Giving the same name twice is possible but makes the code
harder to understand.

> [...]
> + * @param is_idle 1 if called in idle loop (enset registers);
s/enset/unset/ ?

Best regards
Uwe

--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/