Re: [PATCH] ACPICA: don't cond_resched() when irq_disabled orin_atomic

From: Zhang Rui
Date: Fri Dec 04 2009 - 00:38:18 EST


On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 13:36 +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> CC Alexey.
>
> And this is also the fix for
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14483
>
> thanks,
> rui
>
> On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 12:26 +0800, Xiaotian Feng wrote:
> > commit 8bd108d adds preemption point after each opcode parse, then
> > a sleeping function called from invalid context bug was founded
> > during suspend/resume stage. this was fixed in commit abe1dfa by
> > don't cond_resched when irq_disabled. But recent commit 138d156 changes
> > the behaviour to don't cond_resched when in_atomic. This makes the
> > sleeping function called from invalid context bug happen again, which
> > is reported in http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/1/371.
> >
> > The fix is to cond_sched() only when preemptible, which means not in
> > irq_disabled or in_atomic.
> >
> > Reported-and-bisected-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h | 2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h b/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
> > index 9d7febd..5b415ee 100644
> > --- a/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
> > +++ b/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
> > @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static inline void *acpi_os_acquire_object(acpi_cache_t * cache)
> > #include <linux/hardirq.h>
> > #define ACPI_PREEMPTION_POINT() \
> > do { \
> > - if (!in_atomic_preempt_off()) \
> > + if (preemptible()) \
> > cond_resched(); \
> > } while (0)
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/