Re: [PATCH] tracing: add DEFINE_EVENT(), DEFINE_SINGLE_EVENT()support to docbook

[Steven Rostedt]

On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 16:23 -0500, Jason Baron wrote:
> The introduction of the new 'DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS()' obviates the need for the
> 'TRACE_EVENT()' macro in some cases. Thus, docbook style comments that used
> to live with 'TRACE_EVENT()' are now moved to 'DEFINE_EVENT()'. Thus, we need
> to make the docbook system understand the new 'DEFINE_EVENT()' macro. In
> addition I've tried to futureproof the patch, by also adding support for
> 'DEFINE_SINGLE_EVENT()', since there has been discussion about renaming:
> TRACE_EVENT() -> DEFINE_SINGLE_EVENT().
> 
> Without this patch the tracepoint docbook fails to build.
> 
> I've verified that this patch correctly builds the tracepoint docbook which
> currently covers signals, and irqs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/