Re: [PATCH] kbuild: specify absolute paths for cscope

[Sam Ravnborg]

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 06:13:47PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> On 26.11.2009 13:34, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Some tools (like my favourite editor, vim) can't handle relative
> > paths from cscope as soon as cscope.out is no longer in $PWD. Use
> > absolute paths when generating cscope.files, which seems to be
> > the recommended way to generate cscope.out, anyway (at least according
> > to cscope.sf.net).
> 
> But it will fail if you rename the source directory. I'm not sure what
> is worse, I myself don't use cscope much. Fixing vim would be the ideal
> solution of course (it already handles ../tags fine).

For tags I recall we fall back to absolute path only for O=... builds.
This made the tags file considerably smaller for a non O=.. build
thus speeding up the search.

So unconditionally using absolute paths for cscope may have drawbacks.

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/