Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

[Jarod Wilson]

On Nov 29, 2009, at 4:31 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:

> On Nov 29, 2009, at 12:27 PM, Krzysztof Halasa <khc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> 1. Do we agree that a lirc (-style) kernel-user interface is needed at
>>  least?
>> 
>> 2. Is there any problem with lirc kernel-user interface?
>> 
>> If the answer for #1 is "yes" and for #2 is "no" then perhaps we merge
>> the Jarod's lirc patches (at least the core) so at least the
>> non-controversial part is done?
> 
> 
> Isn't the meat of Jarod's patch the lirc interface?

Patch 1 was the lirc interface, 2 and 3 are individual device drivers that use it.

/me has some catching up to do on this thread after being partially detached from the computer over the holiday weekend here in the US...

-- 
Jarod Wilson
jarod@xxxxxxxxxxxx



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/