Re: [PATCH] unifdef: update to upstream revision 1.189

[Sam Ravnborg]

Hi Tony.

On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 03:50:30PM +0000, Tony Finch wrote:
> Fix handling of input files (e.g. with no newline at EOF) that could
> make unifdef get into an unexpected state and call abort().
> 
> The new -B option compresses blank lines around a deleted section
> so that blank lines around "paragraphs" of code don't get doubled.
> 
> The evaluator can now handle macros with arguments, and unbracketed
> arguments to the "defined" operator.

Can you confirm that this does not regress with respect to the changes
that Russell King implemented in the commit:
eedc9d83eaab2d35fb9dd1ec25b765dec964e26c
("kbuild: fix headers_exports with boolean expression")


I long time ago started a small project to do a dedicated
implementation of unifdef solely for use by the kernel.
Today we do some preprocessing in perl - and then
we pass the result to unifdef file by file.
A dedicated program could do this much faster -
and this would be a bigger incentive for the kernel supplied
tools to actually use the exported headers.

But I never got far with it and I think the code was
lost when I changed computer some time ago.

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/