Re: PATCH: softlockup: Fix hung_task_check_count sysctl

[AmÃrico Wang]

On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Frederic Weisbecker
<fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:46:53AM +0800, AmÃrico Wang wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Anton Blanchard <anton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm seeing spikes of up to 0.5ms in khungtaskd on a large machine. To reduce
>> > this source of jitter I tried setting hung_task_check_count to 0:
>> >
>> > # echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_check_count
>> >
>> > which didn't have the intended response. Change to a post increment of
>> > max_count, so a value of 0 means check 0 tasks.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>
>> Ack.
>>
>> I would also suggest to make 'max_count' as unsigned long,
>> since sysctl_hung_task_check_count is.
>>
>> Thanks.
>
>
> Also, the batch_count thing should be dropped I think.
> This is a hardcoded, not overridable pause after 1024
> threads checks to avoid latencies caused by rcu_read_lock.
> But now we have PREEMPT_RCU so people can enable it if
> they care about latency. We should remove it as it adds
> unnecessary complexity.

This sounds OK for me.

>
> I'm preparing a patch for that, on top of Anton patch.
>

Great!

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/