Re: [PATCH -tip v5 03/10] kprobes: Introduce kprobes jumpoptimization

[Steven Rostedt]

On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 15:59 -0500, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:

> > I see...so the non-preemptible kernel requirement looks
> > hard to workaround :-s
> 
> It's the next challenge I think :-)
> Even though, kprobes itself still work on preemptive kernel,
> so we don't lose any functionality.

>From kstop_machine, we could search all tasks to see if any are about to
resume in the modified location. If there is, we could either

1) insert a normal kprobe
2) modify the return address of the task to jump to some trampoline to 
   finish the work and return to the code spot with a direct jump.

#2 is kind of nasty but seems like a fun thing to implement ;-)

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/