Re: lockdep complaints in slab allocator

[Pekka Enberg]

Peter Zijlstra kirjoitti:
> On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 22:59 +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>
> > Thanks! Please let me know when you're hammered it enough :-). Peter,
> > may I have your ACK or NAK on the patch, please?
>
> Well, I'm not going to NAK it, for I think it does clean up that
> recursion crap a little, but it should have more merit that
> side-stepping lockdep.
>
> If you too feel it make SLAB ever so slightly more palatable then ACK,
> otherwise I'm perfectly fine with letting SLAB bitrot.

I'll take that as an ACK ;-) Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/