Re: [PATCH] x86: fix gart iommu using for amd 64 bit system

[Yinghai Lu]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>> don't think user will like to use SWIOTLB instead of swiotlb.
>> I doubt that users care about a way to fix their problems.
> 
> As far as swiotlb vs. GART goes, arguably a non-bouncing hw based 
> solution (GART) is superior to a bouncing one (swiotlb), right?
> 

yes, should use GART if possible.

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/