Re: [PATCH v6] x86/apic: limit irq affinity

[Peter P Waskiewicz Jr]

On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 09:41 -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:55:15 +0100 (CET)
> >> > Furthermore, the /sysfs topology information should include IRQ
> >> > routing data in this case.
> >> 
> >> Hmm, not sure about that. You'd need to scan through all the nodes to
> >> find the set of CPUs where an irq can be routed to. I prefer to have
> >> the information exposed by the irq enumeration (which is currently in
> >> /proc/irq though).
> >
> > yes please.
> >
> > one device can have multiple irqs
> > one irq can be servicing multiple devices
> >
> > expressing that in sysfs is a nightmare, while
> > sticking it in /proc/irq *where the rest of the info is* is
> > much nicer for apps like irqbalance
> 
> Oii.
> 
> I don't think it is bad to export information to applications like irqbalance.
> 
> I think it pretty horrible that one of the standard ways I have heard
> to improve performance on 10G nics is to kill irqbalance.
> 

This is something I'm actively trying to fix (see thread "irq: Add
node_affinity CPU masks for smarter irqbalance hints").  That patch may
not be the final answer, but whatever comes of it will fix the
recommendation of "killall irqbalance" for performance boosts.

Cheers,
-PJ

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/