Re: [MM] Make mm counters per cpu instead of atomic

[Zhang, Yanmin]

On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 08:31 -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> 
> > Another theoretic issue is below scenario:
> > Process A get the read lock on cpu 0 and is scheduled to cpu 2 to unlock. Then
> > it's scheduled back to cpu 0 to repeat the step. eventually, the reader counter
> > will overflow. Considering multiple thread cases, it might be faster to
> > overflow than what we imagine. When it overflows, processes will hang there.
> 
> True.... We need to find some alternative to per cpu data to scale mmap
> sem then.
I ran lots of benchmarks such like specjbb2005/hackbench/tbench/dbench/iozone
/sysbench_oltp(mysql)/aim7 against percpu tree(based on 2.6.32-rc7) on a 4*8*2 logical
cpu machine, and didn't find big result difference between with your patch and without
your patch.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/