Re: [PATCH 0/5] perf kmem: Add more functions and show morestatistics

[Ingo Molnar]

* Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Ingo,
> 
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Certainly we can postpone it, as long as there's rough strategic
> > consensus on the way forward. I'd hate to have two overlapping core
> > kernel facilities and friction between the groups pursuing them and
> > constant distraction from having two targets.
> 
> Sure, like I said, I think "kmem perf" is the way forward. The only 
> reason we did kmemtrace userspace out-of-tree was because there was no 
> perf (or ftrace!) at the time and there wasn't much interest in 
> putting userspace tools in the tree.
> 
> I hope that counts as a "rough strategic consensus" :-)

it does :-)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/