Re: lockdep complaints in slab allocator

[Pekka Enberg]

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > That turns out to be _very_ hard. How about something like the following
> > untested patch which delays slab_destroy() while we're under nc->lock.

On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 13:30 -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Code changes to deal with a diagnostic issue?

OK, fair enough. If I suffer permanent brain damage from staring at the
SLAB code for too long, I hope you and Matt will chip in to pay for my
medication.

I think I was looking at the wrong thing here. The problem is in
cache_free_alien() so the comment in slab_destroy() isn't relevant.
Looking at init_lock_keys() we already do special lockdep annotations
but there's a catch (as explained in a comment on top of
on_slab_alc_key):

 * We set lock class for alien array caches which are up during init.
 * The lock annotation will be lost if all cpus of a node goes down and
 * then comes back up during hotplug

Paul said he was running CPU hotplug so maybe that explains the problem?

			Pekka

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/