Re: [PATCH 1/1] twl4030-regulator: Remove regulator from allgroups when disabling

[Liam Girdwood]

On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 09:08 +0200, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> Hello Liam,
> 
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 08:07:59PM +0100, ext Liam Girdwood wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 18:29 +0200, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > > Just remove regulator from all groups when disabling. This way we
> > > avoid problems if boot loader touches twl4030 registers.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/regulator/twl4030-regulator.c |    2 +-
> > >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/regulator/twl4030-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/twl4030-regulator.c
> > > index e2032fb..27b3115 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/regulator/twl4030-regulator.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/regulator/twl4030-regulator.c
> > > @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static int twl4030reg_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> > >  	if (grp < 0)
> > >  		return grp;
> > >  
> > > -	grp &= ~P1_GRP;
> > > +	grp &= ~(P1_GRP & P2_GRP | P3_GRP);
> > >  	return twl4030reg_write(info, VREG_GRP, grp);
> > >  }
> > >  
> > 
> > Applied.
> 
> Thanks for applying. But this one has actually a typo
> It was supposed to be:
> 
> +	grp &= ~(P1_GRP | P2_GRP | P3_GRP);
> 
> Could you please apply this one instead:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/11/20/231
> 
> ?

Ah, I did see the new message but applied the wrong one (they both had
the same subject, a V2 subject would have been better).

Applied correct version now.

Thanks

Liam

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/