On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 19:27 +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 22:28 +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:There's nothing to add. It's a patch to cleanup the coding style, that's it.
That doesn't seem too positive. Or at least there's no indication thatI'd re-submit with a better description of the patch. You should always
somebody will pick it up.
try to describe what your doing as accurately as possible so the
maintainer doesn't have to work very hard to know what your doing.
How do you know the coding style isn't correct? Did you just visually
inspect it?
ThatAll of my patches have been picked up, except the ones for ACPI. I
particular patch just has a one liner description that wasn't very
informative .. Either that or re-submit your series without that patch
if you don't have confidence in it.
haven't received a single comment from them, which would explain the
current state of the code.
If somebody raised the hand and said; I'll merge this, please resend,
I'd do that, otherwise I think it's a waste of time.
Patches often times aren't accepted in the first submission, could be
for lots of reasons. It's your series tho ..
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html