Re: [PATCH -v2 6/9] bootmem: add free_bootmem_late

[FUJITA Tomonori]

Thanks for reviewing,

On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:00:53 +0100
Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I find it a bit weird that free_all_bootmem() callers have to take
> care of totalram_pages while this function does the accounting on its
> own.

Ah, it might be consistent to make the callers take care of
totalram_pages like free_all_bootmem.


> And I think the function is more logically placed right below
> free_bootmem(), like you did in the header.

However, if we do the above, we have:

unsigned long free_bootmem_late(unsigned long addr, unsigned long
size)

Which looks inconsistent a bit with free_bootmem()?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/