Re: linux-next: sysctl tree build failure

[Eric W. Biederman]

Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hi Eric,
>
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:11:34 -0800 ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:
>>
>> Any clue how all_noconfig happened to have CONFIG_SYSCTL_SYSCALL set?
>
> CONFIG_SYSCTL_SYSCALL defaults to y and only depends on
> CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL which also defaults to y and depends on CONFIG_PROC_FS
> which also defaults to y.  All three are only selectable if
> CONFIG_EMBEDDED is y (which it obviously isn't).

Ah so.  An interesting twist of fate.  Thank you for satisfying my
curiosity.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/