Re: [PATCH] Implement prctl(PR_GET_ENDIAN) for all architectures

From: Helge Deller
Date: Tue Nov 10 2009 - 17:04:30 EST


On 11/09/2009 09:46 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:35:33 +0200
Helge Deller<deller@xxxxxx> wrote:

The PR_GET_ENDIAN and PR_SET_ENDIAN prctl() calls have been implemented
to allow to switch processes at runtime from big-endian to little-endian
mode (and vice versa) on PowerPC processors. Since the other architectures
don't support this feature, they currently will just fail and return -EINVAL.

This patch adds just minimal overhead and implements the PR_GET_ENDIAN
call for all other architectures by returning the native endianess of
the architecture. Furthermore, calling prctl(PR_SET_ENDIAN) with the
native endianess of the architecture will succeed, while trying to
set another (not-supported) endianess, will fail.

The patch can be tested with the following program:

#include<stdio.h>
#include<linux/prctl.h>

int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int endian, ret;

ret = prctl(PR_GET_ENDIAN,&endian);
if (ret)
perror("prctl(PR_GET_ENDIAN) not implemented");
printf("current process/machine is running in %s endian mode (%d)\n",
endian == PR_ENDIAN_LITTLE ? "little":"big", endian);

/* setting native endianess should succeed */
ret = prctl(PR_SET_ENDIAN, endian);
printf("prctl(PR_SET_ENDIAN,%d) should succeed: %s\n",
endian, ret == 0 ? "OK":"FAIL");

/* setting foreign endianess should fail */
endian = (endian == PR_ENDIAN_LITTLE) ?
PR_ENDIAN_BIG : PR_ENDIAN_LITTLE;
ret = prctl(PR_SET_ENDIAN, endian);
printf("prctl(PR_SET_ENDIAN,%d) should fail: %s\n",
endian, ret == 0 ? "OK":"FAIL");
}


The changelog forgot to provide any reason for making this change to
the kernel.

The reason - and the patch - is pretty trivial.
The kernel provides an interface (for all architectures) which is currently
only useable on one single architecture (ppc).
So, either we could just remove the interface alltogether for all architectures
beside ppc, or implement the functionality for all architectures so that they
return at least some kind of useful values back to userspace.
I hope this qualifies for kernel inclusion?

Helge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/