Re: [PATCH] DRTL kernel 2.6.32-rc3 : SCHED_EDF, DI RT-Mutex,Deadline Based Interrupt Handlers

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 17:24 +0100, Raistlin wrote:
> Relying on userspace to do things
> 'intelligently' is something I'm not sure I would do, especially in a so
> much general purpose OS like Linux, used in so much different contexts.
> But, again, that's only my opinion. :-) 

I'd put it even stronger, relying on userspace to do something
intelligent is utterly stupid. We have to assume userspace is hostile
and out to get you.

Therefore I fully support the model that puts admission control into the
kernel, because that provides isolation between, and guarantees to
applications.

Not providing this, and having no overload protection is one of the
biggest failures of SCHED_FIFO/RR.

On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 19:33 +0530, Soumya K S wrote:
> Hmm I guess you too are "totally" dependent on user giving you the
> right parameters _intelligently_ (deadline / budget)... I guess we are
> not too different there expecting the users to be _aware_ ..!

The difference is that if A messes up its own parameters only A suffers
and the rest of the system continues to work as expected.

With your approach anything is out the window.

So yes, userspace needs to be aware, but a task can only screw itself,
not everybody else, which is a very important feature.

@ DRTL folks:

If you want deadline based scheduling (it appears you do) I suggest you
start helping out Dario, your proposal isn't going to happen.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/