Peter Zijlstra wrote:On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 21:31 +0900, Kenji Kaneshige wrote:Hi,
I frequently encounter the kernel oops attached below in resched_task()
with 2.6.31.5. This kernel oops happens also with 2.6.32-rc5. I don't
know about other kernel.
Here is my analysis:
The immediate cause of this kernel oops is that NULL was passed to
resched_task() from resched_cpu(). From my investigation, this was
caused as follows:
- trigger_load_balance() caluculated cpu number of idle load balancer
using find_new_ilb(), and find_new_ilb() returned *offline* CPU
number (16 in my case). Note that I didn't do any CPU hotplug
operation. On my system, present, online and offline under
/sys/devices/system/cpu/ are
[kanesige@localhost ~]$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/present
0-15
[kanesige@localhost ~]$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/online
0-15
[kanesige@localhost ~]$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/offline
16-255
And nr_cpu_ids is 256.
- resched_cpu() calculated current task by cpu_curr() with offline CPU
number.
So this kernel oops seems to be caused by invalid CPU number returned
from find_new_ilb(). I don't know the find_new_ilb() implementation,
but I suspect the initialization of cpumasks used by find_new_ilb().
The patch attached below seems to fix the problem (With this patch,
the kernel oops doesn't happen). But I don't know if this is the
correct fix.
Please send patches against -tip.
You might find that Rusty has already fixed a similar issue there in
commit: 49557e620339cb134127b5bfbcfecc06b77d0232.
Now, Rusty's patch does not clear the ilb mask, so maybe it doesn't
fully cover your issue, please test.
Thank you for quick response.
I didn't notice Rusty's fix.
I'll look at and test it tomorrow.