Re: [BUGFIX -v2 for .32] crypto, gcm, fix another complete call incomplete fuction

[Herbert Xu]

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:49:59AM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
>
> Yes. This is for performance only. Because crypto_gcm_reqctx(req) is not
> so trivial (it needs access tfm), and used by every xxx_done function,
> so I think it is better to just call crypto_gcm_reqctx once and pass it
> down. Do you think so?

Since we only support blocksize == 16, that means the alignment
cannot exceed 16 bytes.  So just always align to 16 bytes and that
should make crypto_gcm_reqctx trivial once optimised by the
compiler.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/