Re: i686 quirk for AMD Geode

[Martin Schleier]

On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 18:22:18 Alan Cox wrote:
> > If it wasn't riddled with 19 errors (not bad for only 133 lines),
> > I would have bothered to remove these irrelevant lines.
> 
> Checkpatch is just formatting - its just an aide nothing more.
> It's not remotely useful to bother with them for stuff that is
> basically sanely formatted until such point as someone is actually
> sure the patch is worth going into the tree.

the utility is called checkpatch and not checkstyle or checkformatting.
And there's a good reason behind this decision, because it does
more than just checking style.

e.g:
 - correct use of some blackfin hi/lo macros.
 - if certain data structures are declared as const
   (struct seq_operations/file_operations)
 - correct use of NR_CPUS is usually wrong
 - complains about in_atomic() outside core kernel code
 - warns about LINUX_VERSION_CODE, #if 0,
   volatile or deprecated functions.
 - informs about needless kfree/usb_free_urb checks
 - etc...

and I'm sure that future modifications will add more
useful functionality _checks_ to many more _common pitfalls_ 
areas.
-- 
DSL-Preisknaller: DSL Komplettpakete von GMX schon für 
16,99 Euro mtl.!* Hier klicken: http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl02
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/