Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH RFC] TCPCT part 1d: generate Responder Cookie
From: William Allen Simpson
Date: Thu Nov 05 2009 - 14:44:49 EST
Eric Dumazet wrote:
William Allen Simpson a écrit :
Yes, I misunderstood, but it's clear now. As I have to re-spin the whole
As you suggest, I'll use the _bh suffix everywhere until every i is dottedI think you misunderstood my advice ;)
and t is crossed. Then, check for efficiency later after thorough
analysis by experts such as yourself.
This code will be hit on every SYN and SYNACK that has a cookie option.
But it's just prior to a CPU intensive sha_transform -- in comparison,
kit and kaboodle after the recent net-next crashing bug fixes, I'll post
another complete set tomorrow to the net list.
Thanks again (for all messages).
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/