Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH RFC] TCPCT part 1d: generate Responder Cookie

[William Allen Simpson]

Eric Dumazet wrote:
> William Allen Simpson a écrit :
> > As you suggest, I'll use the _bh suffix everywhere until every i is dotted
> > and t is crossed.  Then, check for efficiency later after thorough
> > analysis by experts such as yourself.
> >
> > This code will be hit on every SYN and SYNACK that has a cookie option.
> > But it's just prior to a CPU intensive sha_transform -- in comparison,
> > it's trivial.
> I think you misunderstood my advice ;)
Yes, I misunderstood, but it's clear now.  As I have to re-spin the whole
kit and kaboodle after the recent net-next crashing bug fixes, I'll post
another complete set tomorrow to the net list.

Thanks again (for all messages).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/