Re: [RFC] Mount point suggestions for cgroup

From: Dave Hansen
Date: Wed Nov 04 2009 - 10:22:40 EST

On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 13:46 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> The reason I liked /dev/cgroup was because cpusets could be
> mounted at /dev/cpuset or /dev/cgroup/cpuset. My concern with /cgroup
> is that a ls "/" now becomes larger in size. But I'll take your vote
> for it as +1 for /cgroup.

/dev/pts is a decent precedent for doing it under /dev, although it does
deal with actual devices. cgroups do not.

-- Dave

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at