Re: [PATCH 3/3] vmscan: Force kswapd to take notice faster whenhigh-order watermarks are being hit
From: Mel Gorman
Date: Tue Nov 03 2009 - 21:08:24 EST
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 01:18:11AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > From vmstat for .31.1:
> > kswapd_highorder_rewakeup 20
> > kswapd_slept_prematurely_fast 307
> > kswapd_slept_prematurely_slow 105
> This is useful.
> The high premature_fast shows that after kswapd apparently finishes its work,
> the high waterwater marks are being breached very quickly (the fast counter
> being positive). The "slow" counter is even worse. Your machine is getting
> from the high to low watermark quickly without kswapd noticing and processes
> depending on the atomics are not waiting long enough.
Sorry, that should have been
The premature_fast shows that after kswapd finishes its work, the low
waterwater marks are being breached very quickly as kswapd is being rewoken
up. The "slow" counter is slightly worse. Just after kswapd sleeps, the
high watermark is being breached again.
Either counter being positive implies that kswapd is having to do too
much work while parallel allocators are chewing up the high-order pages
quickly. The effect of the patch should still be to delay the rate high-order
pages are consumed but it assumes there are enough high-order requests that
can go to sleep.
Mentioning sleep, I'm going to get some.
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/