Re: [PATCH 0/5] Candidate fix for increased number of GFP_ATOMICfailures V2
From: Karol Lewandowski
Date: Tue Nov 03 2009 - 21:03:14 EST
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 08:30:34PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Does applying the following on top make any difference?
> ==== CUT HERE ====
> PM: Shrink memory before suspend
No, this patch didn't change anything either.
IIRC I get failures while free(1) shows as much as 20MB free RAM
(ie. without buffers/caches). Additionaly nr_free_pages (from
/proc/vmstat) stays at about 800-1000 under heavy memory pressure
(gitk on full linux repository).
--- babbling follows ---
Hmm, I wonder if it's really timing issue then wouldn't be the case
that lowering swappiness sysctl would make problem more visible?
I've vm.swappiness=15, would testing with higher value make any sense?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/