Re: [RFC][-mm][PATCH 2/6] oom-killer: count swap usage per process.

From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Date: Tue Nov 03 2009 - 19:05:17 EST


On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:47:23 -0800 (PST)
David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, 2 Nov 2009, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>
> > Now, anon_rss and file_rss is counted as RSS and exported via /proc.
> > RSS usage is important information but one more information which
> > is often asked by users is "usage of swap".(user support team said.)
> >
> > This patch counts swap entry usage per process and show it via
> > /proc/<pid>/status. I think status file is robust against new entry.
> > Then, it is the first candidate..
> >
> > Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Acked-by; David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks! I think this should be added to -mm now while the remainder of
> your patchset is developed and reviewed, it's helpful as an independent
> change.
>
> > Index: mmotm-2.6.32-Nov2/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- mmotm-2.6.32-Nov2.orig/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> > +++ mmotm-2.6.32-Nov2/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
> > void task_mem(struct seq_file *m, struct mm_struct *mm)
> > {
> > unsigned long data, text, lib;
> > - unsigned long hiwater_vm, total_vm, hiwater_rss, total_rss;
> > + unsigned long hiwater_vm, total_vm, hiwater_rss, total_rss, swap;
> >
> > /*
> > * Note: to minimize their overhead, mm maintains hiwater_vm and
> > @@ -36,6 +36,8 @@ void task_mem(struct seq_file *m, struct
> > data = mm->total_vm - mm->shared_vm - mm->stack_vm;
> > text = (PAGE_ALIGN(mm->end_code) - (mm->start_code & PAGE_MASK)) >> 10;
> > lib = (mm->exec_vm << (PAGE_SHIFT-10)) - text;
> > +
> > + swap = get_mm_counter(mm, swap_usage);
> > seq_printf(m,
> > "VmPeak:\t%8lu kB\n"
> > "VmSize:\t%8lu kB\n"
>
> Not sure about this newline though.

I'll clean up more. Thank you for pointing out.

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/