Re: [dm-devel] Re: Ext3 sequential read performance drop 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30,2.6.31,...
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Tue Nov 03 2009 - 11:51:22 EST
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 21:42:30 +1100 "NeilBrown" <neilb@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, November 3, 2009 9:06 pm, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 01:55:54PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:09:55 +0200
> >> Laurent CORBES <laurent.corbes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > While benchmarking some systems I discover a big sequential read
> >> performance
> >> > drop using ext3 on ~ big files. The drop seems to be introduced in
> >> 2.6.30. I'm
> >> > testing with 188.8.131.52 -> 184.108.40.206 -> 220.127.116.11 -> 18.104.22.168.
> >> Seems that large performance regressions aren't of interest to this
> >> list :(
> > No sure which list you mean, but dm-devel is for dm, not md.
> We're also
> > seeing similarly massive performance drops with md and ext3/xfs as
> > already reported on the list. Someone tracked it down to writeback
> > changes as usual, but there it got stuck.
> I'm still looking - running some basic tests on 4 filesystems over
> half a dozen recent kernels to see what has been happening.
> I have a suspicion that there a multiple problems.
> In particular, XFS has a strange degradation which was papered over
> by commit c8a4051c3731b.
> I'm beginning to wonder if it was caused by commit 17bc6c30cf6bf
> but I haven't actually tested that yet.
I think Laurent's workload involves only reads, with no writes.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/