[PATCH] x86: Make sure we also print a Code: line for show_regs()

[Arjan van de Ven]

show_regs() is called as a mini BUG() equivalent in some places,
specifically for the "scheduling while atomic" case.

Unfortunately right now it does not print a Code: like unlike
a real bug/oops.

This patch changes the x86 implementation of show_regs() so that
it calls the same function as oopses do to print the registers
as well as the Code: line.

Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c |    2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c |    3 +--
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
index f2cb086..b124f2f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ void __show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs, int all)
 
 void show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-	__show_regs(regs, 1);
+	show_registers(regs);
 	show_trace(NULL, regs, &regs->sp, regs->bp);
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
index 959b062..e53e66f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
@@ -228,8 +228,7 @@ void __show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs, int all)
 
 void show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-	printk(KERN_INFO "CPU %d:", smp_processor_id());
-	__show_regs(regs, 1);
+	show_registers(regs);
 	show_trace(NULL, regs, (void *)(regs + 1), regs->bp);
 }
 
-- 
1.6.0.6



-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/