Re: [patch 0/6] x86: cleanups and fixes for irq migration codeduring cpu offline
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Mon Nov 02 2009 - 09:59:55 EST
* Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 15:24 -0700, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
> > First four patches in the series unify the fixup_irqs() along with
> > couple of cleanups. It also fixes an issue where the interrupt subsystem can
> > point the interrupt to the offlined cpu (for non interrupt-remapping case)
> > causing the device to not work. This was observed by Gary.
> > These four patches are ready for inclusion
> Ingo, if no one has any objections, can you please consider the first
> four patches in this patchset for -tip testing?
Yep, queued them up. I went for the whole batch as it looks good and
needs wider testing as well.
Note, i fixed a few small details in patch #5.
Note #2, the signoffs from Gary looked weird - they were put last while
the patches did not come from him. I changed those to Acked-by - i
suppose that was the intention, right?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/