Re: Help needed, Re: [Bug #14334] pcmcia suspend regression from to - Dell Inspiron 600m

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Mon Nov 02 2009 - 08:38:11 EST

On Sunday 01 November 2009, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> Hey,
> On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 09:36:10AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Commit 0c570cdeb8fdfcb354a3e9cd81bfc6a09c19de0c
> > (PM / yenta: Fix cardbus suspend/resume regression) caused resume to
> > fail on systems with two CardBus bridges. While the exact nature
> > of the failure is not known at the moment, it can be worked around by
> > splitting the yenta resume into an early part, executed during the
> > early phase of resume, that will only resume the socket and power it
> > up if there was a card in it during suspend, and a late part,
> > executed during "regular" resume, that will carry out all of the
> > remaining yenta resume operations.
> >
> > Fixes, which is a
> > listed regression from 2.6.31.
> The only issue I see is that we now return 0 unconditionally on the resume
> callbacks.

Hmm. pcmcia_socket_dev_suspend() and pcmcia_socket_dev_resume() return 0
unconditionally even without the patch, so it doesn't change that.

> Otherwise, it's
> Acked-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>



To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at