Re: WARNING: at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:154 inet_sock_destruct
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Fri Oct 30 2009 - 11:04:03 EST
Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> Francis Moreau a écrit :
>> Hello Eric,
>>
>> It seems I still have a related bug, please have a look to the following oops.
>>
>> This happened on a 2.6.32-rc5 where your patch is included.
>>
>> [107304.558821] nfsd: last server has exited, flushing export cache
>> [107304.558848] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> [107304.558858] WARNING: at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:153
>> inet_sock_destruct+0x161/0x17c()
>> [107304.558862] Hardware name: P5K-VM
>> [107304.558865] Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm jfs loop nfsd lockd
>> nfs_acl auth_rpcgss exportfs sunrpc [last unloaded: microcode]
>> [107304.558889] Pid: 8198, comm: nfsd Tainted: G M 2.6.32-rc5 #25
>> [107304.558892] Call Trace:
>> [107304.558899] [<ffffffff81429f19>] ? inet_sock_destruct+0x161/0x17c
>> [107304.558907] [<ffffffff810487e9>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7c/0xa9
>> [107304.558914] [<ffffffff8104882a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x14/0x16
>> [107304.558920] [<ffffffff81429f19>] inet_sock_destruct+0x161/0x17c
>> [107304.558927] [<ffffffff813c8741>] __sk_free+0x23/0xe7
>> [107304.558933] [<ffffffff813c8881>] sk_free+0x1f/0x21
>> [107304.558939] [<ffffffff813c894b>] sk_common_release+0xc8/0xcd
>> [107304.558944] [<ffffffff81420b59>] udp_lib_close+0xe/0x10
>> [107304.558951] [<ffffffff814299bf>] inet_release+0x55/0x5c
>> [107304.558957] [<ffffffff813c5aa9>] sock_release+0x1f/0x71
>> [107304.558962] [<ffffffff813c5b22>] sock_close+0x27/0x2b
>> [107304.558968] [<ffffffff810eb60f>] __fput+0xfb/0x1c0
>> [107304.558973] [<ffffffff810eb6f1>] fput+0x1d/0x1f
>> [107304.558995] [<ffffffffa0013e23>] svc_sock_free+0x40/0x56 [sunrpc]
>> [107304.559018] [<ffffffffa001f392>] svc_xprt_free+0x43/0x53 [sunrpc]
>> [107304.559038] [<ffffffffa001f34f>] ? svc_xprt_free+0x0/0x53 [sunrpc]
>> [107304.559048] [<ffffffff811d9275>] kref_put+0x43/0x4f
>> [107304.559069] [<ffffffffa001e67a>] svc_close_xprt+0x55/0x5e [sunrpc]
>> [107304.559088] [<ffffffffa001e6d3>] svc_close_all+0x50/0x69 [sunrpc]
>> [107304.559107] [<ffffffffa0012a2b>] svc_destroy+0x9e/0x142 [sunrpc]
>> [107304.559126] [<ffffffffa0012b88>] svc_exit_thread+0xb9/0xc2 [sunrpc]
>> [107304.559138] [<ffffffffa008981b>] ? nfsd+0x0/0x13f [nfsd]
>> [107304.559149] [<ffffffffa0089940>] nfsd+0x125/0x13f [nfsd]
>> [107304.559157] [<ffffffff810685e3>] kthread+0x82/0x8a
>> [107304.559164] [<ffffffff8100c13a>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
>> [107304.559172] [<ffffffff8100baad>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
>> [107304.559179] [<ffffffff81068561>] ? kthread+0x0/0x8a
>> [107304.559185] [<ffffffff8100c130>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
>> [107304.559191] ---[ end trace c107131f4762168c ]---
>> [107304.927931] NFSD: Using /var/lib/nfs/v4recovery as the NFSv4 state
>> recovery directory
>> [107304.932765] NFSD: starting 90-second grace period
>>
>
> This oops occurring again and again with SUNRPC finally gave me the right pointer.
>
> David, we added two years ago memory accounting to UDP, and this changed
> requirements about calling skb_free_datagram() in the right context.
>
> I wish we had an ASSERT_SOCK_LOCKED() debugging facility :(
>
> Francis, would you please test following patch ?
Here is the updated patch (against linux-2.6) , in case other people are interested to test it.
[PATCH take2] net: fix sk_forward_alloc corruption
On UDP sockets, we must call skb_free_datagram() with socket locked,
or risk sk_forward_alloc corruption. This requirement is not respected
in SUNRPC.
Add a convenient helper, skb_free_datagram_locked() and use it in SUNRPC
Reported-by: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/skbuff.h | 2 ++
net/core/datagram.c | 10 +++++++++-
net/ipv4/udp.c | 4 +---
net/ipv6/udp.c | 4 +---
net/sunrpc/svcsock.c | 10 +++++-----
5 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
index df7b23a..266878f 100644
--- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
+++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
@@ -1757,6 +1757,8 @@ extern int skb_copy_datagram_const_iovec(const struct sk_buff *from,
int to_offset,
int size);
extern void skb_free_datagram(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
+extern void skb_free_datagram_locked(struct sock *sk,
+ struct sk_buff *skb);
extern int skb_kill_datagram(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
unsigned int flags);
extern __wsum skb_checksum(const struct sk_buff *skb, int offset,
diff --git a/net/core/datagram.c b/net/core/datagram.c
index 1c6cf3a..4ade301 100644
--- a/net/core/datagram.c
+++ b/net/core/datagram.c
@@ -224,6 +224,15 @@ void skb_free_datagram(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
consume_skb(skb);
sk_mem_reclaim_partial(sk);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_free_datagram);
+
+void skb_free_datagram_locked(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ lock_sock(sk);
+ skb_free_datagram(sk, skb);
+ release_sock(sk);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_free_datagram_locked);
/**
* skb_kill_datagram - Free a datagram skbuff forcibly
@@ -752,5 +761,4 @@ unsigned int datagram_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock,
EXPORT_SYMBOL(datagram_poll);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_iovec);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_copy_datagram_iovec);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_free_datagram);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_recv_datagram);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
index d0d436d..0fa9f70 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
@@ -999,9 +999,7 @@ try_again:
err = ulen;
out_free:
- lock_sock(sk);
- skb_free_datagram(sk, skb);
- release_sock(sk);
+ skb_free_datagram_locked(sk, skb);
out:
return err;
diff --git a/net/ipv6/udp.c b/net/ipv6/udp.c
index 3a60f12..cf538ed 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/udp.c
@@ -288,9 +288,7 @@ try_again:
err = ulen;
out_free:
- lock_sock(sk);
- skb_free_datagram(sk, skb);
- release_sock(sk);
+ skb_free_datagram_locked(sk, skb);
out:
return err;
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
index ccc5e83..1c246a4 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static void svc_release_skb(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
rqstp->rq_xprt_ctxt = NULL;
dprintk("svc: service %p, releasing skb %p\n", rqstp, skb);
- skb_free_datagram(svsk->sk_sk, skb);
+ skb_free_datagram_locked(svsk->sk_sk, skb);
}
}
@@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ static int svc_udp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
"svc: received unknown control message %d/%d; "
"dropping RPC reply datagram\n",
cmh->cmsg_level, cmh->cmsg_type);
- skb_free_datagram(svsk->sk_sk, skb);
+ skb_free_datagram_locked(svsk->sk_sk, skb);
return 0;
}
@@ -588,18 +588,18 @@ static int svc_udp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
if (csum_partial_copy_to_xdr(&rqstp->rq_arg, skb)) {
local_bh_enable();
/* checksum error */
- skb_free_datagram(svsk->sk_sk, skb);
+ skb_free_datagram_locked(svsk->sk_sk, skb);
return 0;
}
local_bh_enable();
- skb_free_datagram(svsk->sk_sk, skb);
+ skb_free_datagram_locked(svsk->sk_sk, skb);
} else {
/* we can use it in-place */
rqstp->rq_arg.head[0].iov_base = skb->data +
sizeof(struct udphdr);
rqstp->rq_arg.head[0].iov_len = len;
if (skb_checksum_complete(skb)) {
- skb_free_datagram(svsk->sk_sk, skb);
+ skb_free_datagram_locked(svsk->sk_sk, skb);
return 0;
}
rqstp->rq_xprt_ctxt = skb;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/