Re: [PATCH 0/5] Candidate fix for increased number of GFP_ATOMICfailures V2

[Karol Lewandowski]

On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:59:26AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:42:08PM +0100, Karol Lewandowski wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 02:46:56PM +0100, Mel LKML wrote:
> > I've tested patches 1+2+3+4 in my normal usage scenario (do some work,
> > suspend, do work, suspend, ...) and it failed today after 4 days (== 4
> > suspend-resume cycles).
> > 
> > I'll test 1-5 now.

2.6.32-rc5 with patches 1-5 fails too.


> Also, what was the behaviour of the e100 driver when suspending before
> this commit?
> 
> 6905b1f1a03a48dcf115a2927f7b87dba8d5e566: Net / e100: Fix suspend of devices that cannot be power managed

This was discussed before with e100 maintainers and Rafael.  Reverting
this patch didn't change anything.


Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/