Re: pull request: wireless-next-2.6 2009-10-28

[Johannes Berg]

On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 07:20 -0700, David Miller wrote:

> In case you're concerned, I actually agree with John and others
> on this issue, and disagree with your position.

In this particular case, I think it makes more sense to duplicate the
code _especially_ because it's not working yet. That frees people
hacking on it of having to worry about breaking other devices.

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part