RE: [X86] Fix up silly i1586 boot message.

From: Yuhong Bao
Date: Wed Oct 28 2009 - 10:47:02 EST



<alpine.LSU.2.00.0910280914590.28170@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0


> On Wednesday 2009-10-28 04:08=2C Yuhong Bao wrote:
>>=20
>>
>>> Intel started it first with picking up a ridiculous number for the fami=
ly
>>> ID for the P4 line. There is no technical justification for not keeping
>>> these numbers consecutive.
>
> Once one knows that there are 4 bits for the family field=2C 15 is not
> such a strange value - it is the last value=2C one could take it as
> "reserved=2C and look elsewhere".
Indeed=2C as I said=2C AMD began to use the extended family field with the =
K10.
>>[...] Intel has assigned family 7 for the original Itanium processor
>>[...] there was a bug in original NT 4 truncating family IDs
>>returned by CPUID [...]
>
> That would explain why Intel still shows an oldfashioned family=3D6 on
> many contemporary processors (e.g. core i7). BUT=2C AMD64 processors
> have family=3D15 "almost throughout"=2C and so seem to have at least some
> Intel models.=A0See my second mailing post message for why.
> So that tells us that either NT4 works=2C or nobody uses
> NT4 on fam15s.Family 15 truncated to 3 bits is family 7=2C which do work =
with NT 4=2C while family 8 truncated to 3 bits is family 0.
Yuhong bao =20
_________________________________________________________________
Windows 7: Simplify your PC. Learn more.
http://www.microsoft.com/Windows/windows-7/default.aspx?ocid=3DPID24727::T:=
WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WWL_WIN_evergreen1:102009=
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/