Re: is avoiding compat ioctls possible?

[David Miller]

From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:59:08 +0100

>>  	}
>> -	chunk_array_ptr = (uint64_t *)(unsigned long)(cs->chunks);
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>> +	if (is_compat_task())
> 
> Are the COMPAT ifdefs really needed? The compiler should optimize that
> away anyways on non compat aware architectures, shouldn't it?

There are no non-compat is_compat_task() definitions, nor are there
non-compat build definitions of compat_uptr_t and the assosciated
interfaces.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/