Re: is avoiding compat ioctls possible?

From: Dave Airlie
Date: Tue Oct 27 2009 - 23:01:43 EST


On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:25 PM, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:22:18 +1000
>
>> Is there really no way to avoid compat ioctls? was I delusional in
>> thinking there was?
>
> If you use pointers in your interfaces in any way, no.
>
> And for this drm_radeon_info thing the pointer is "pointless",
> you're just returning 32-bit values to the user, just use
> a u32 inside of the drm_radeon_info structure for the kernel
> to place the result in.

The plan for that was to expand it later, for now 32-bit was all we used.

Dave.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/