Re: symlinks with permissions

[J. Bruce Fields]

On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 10:36:04AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2009-10-26 13:57:49, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 18:46 +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > >   That's what I'd think as well but it does not as I've just learned and
> > > tested :) proc_pid_follow_link actually directly gives a dentry of the
> > > target file without checking permissions on the way.
> 
> It is weider. That symlink even has permissions. Those are not
> checked, either.
>  
> > I seem to remember that is deliberate, the point being that a symlink
> > in /proc/*/fd/ may contain a path that refers to a private namespace.
> 
> Well, it is unexpected and mild security hole.
> 
> Part of the problem is that even  if you have read-only
> filedescriptor, you can upgrade it to read-write, even if path is
> inaccessible to you.
> 
> So if someone passes you read-only filedescriptor, you can still write
> to it.

By the way, nfs-exporting a filesystem also allows bypassing lookup
permissions: anyone on the network can access an inode directly (using
an nfs filehandle) without necessarily traversing any path to that
inode.  (Assuming they can guess the filehandle--probably doable in most
cases.)

Not arguing for or against, just another data point.

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/