Re: Relicensing tracepoints and markers to Dual LGPL v2.1/GPLv2,headers to Dual BSD/GPL

From: Arjan van de Ven
Date: Mon Oct 26 2009 - 10:18:09 EST


On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:17:49 -0400
Pierre-Marc Fournier <pierre-marc.fournier@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > But i also disagree with it on a technical level: code duplication
> > is _bad_. Why does the code have to be duplicated in user-space
> > like that? I'd like Linux tracing code to be in the kernel repo.
> > Why isnt this done properly, as part of the kernel project - to
> > make sure it all stays in sync?
> >
>
> If you mean that this code should solely be used inside the kernel,
> then what you propose technically does not work. There is a very high
> cost to accessing kernel code from userspace.

yeah 100 cycles is insanely high, that's at least the equivalent of...
say one cache miss.


--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/