[PATCH] sysctl: fix false positives when PROC_SYSCTL=n

[Alexey Dobriyan]

Having ->procname but not ->proc_handler is valid when PROC_SYSCTL=n,
people use such combination to reduce ifdefs with non-standard handlers.

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14408

Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
---

 kernel/sysctl_check.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/sysctl_check.c
+++ b/kernel/sysctl_check.c
@@ -1521,7 +1521,7 @@ int sysctl_check_table(struct nsproxy *namespaces, struct ctl_table *table)
 			if (!table->ctl_name && table->strategy)
 				set_fail(&fail, table, "Strategy without ctl_name");
 #endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL
 			if (table->procname && !table->proc_handler)
 				set_fail(&fail, table, "No proc_handler");
 #endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/