Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge]

On 10/14/09 05:32, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 10/14/2009 05:00 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>
>>> So it's broken or disabled when that assumption is wrong?  We could
>>> easily fix that now.  Might even reuse the pvclock structures.
>>>      
>> Well, the kernel internally makes more or less the same assumption; the
>> vsyscall clocksource is the same as the kernel's internal one.  I think
>> idea is that it just drops back to something like hpet if the tsc
>> doesn't have very simple SMP characteristics.
>>
>> If the kernel could characterize the per-cpu properties of the tsc more
>> accurately, then it could use the pvclock mechanism on native.
>>    
>
> It does - that's how kvm implements pvclock on the host side.  See
> kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier() in arch/x86/kvm/x86.c.

The tsc clocksource currently seems a fair bit more picky though; it
doesn't attempt to sync tscs or work out their relative offsets or
rates.  Which seems a bit defeatist.

    J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/