Re: [PATCH] hvc_console: returning 0 from put_chars is not an error

[Timur Tabi]

Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Hmmm, if we are ok with having both options, we should let the hvc backend 
> decide if it wants to drain or to discard.
> 
> If we just busy loop, it actually does not matter how we let hvc_console react 
> on 0, as long as we adopt all backends to use that interface consistent.
> 
> On the other hand, backends might want to do special magic on congestion so I 
> personally tend to let the backend loop instead of hvc_console. But I am really  
> not sure.

The reason that we're asking for this change is that I have an hvc client driver that drops characters during heavy printk() output.  hvc calls my driver, but the output buffer is still full, so the driver just returns 0.

If I add a spin-loop in the driver, then we don't need to change hvc, but now the driver is blocking during user-space print operations (via hvc_write and hvc_push).  

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/